Hey kids, lookie what I found in the archive! Luckily, it doesn't have a damn thing to do with anything that's going on on the list right ow. -Prof. Tim
Re: virus: Altruism, Empathy, the Superorganism, and the Prisoner's Dillema
Tim Rhodes (proftim@speakeasy.org)
Fri, 18 Apr 1997 16:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Ephraim Golgher: "Re: virus: M&M Evolution" Previous message: Tim Rhodes: "RE: virus: Altruism, Empathy, the Superorganism, and the Prisoner's Dillema" In reply to: D. H. Rosdeitcher: "RE: virus: Altruism, Empathy, the Superorganism, and the Prisoner's Dillema"
> I think this ties into the discussion we were having earlier about the
idea
> of "Consensus Reality". Why didn't it get brought up sooner? I wonder if
> it was becuase we were arguing while denying our baser selves? Perhaps, to
> some extent, each of us was more interested in seeing their "meme" triumph
> over everone elses: To stamp their seal, to evangelize, to infect. It was
> only after we all realized that that wasn't working that we began to pause
Yes, and a good one. Maybe in future we can ivoke the "Reed Principle" when we start to get too tied up in ourselves and seeing our memes win.
Of course the parties invovled won't be able to see the need of invoking this, so we may need to count on others, not involed in the particular debate, to step in and tell us to chill out. (Yes, Eva, I got this idea from our conversation.)
Can we all agree to step back for a moment and *just listen* when someone invokes the Reed Principle on us?
-Prof. Tim