In message <038d01be5013$73fe5100$23a2bfce@proftim>, Tim Rhodes
<proftim@speakeasy.org> writes
>Eric wrote:
>
>>Well, I didn't say "objective" meaning, and I'm not even sure what
>>objective meaning would be, come to think of it... it's not like you
>>can go and physically point it out!
>
>This raises an interesting question: Does a thing need to have a physical
>presence in order to have an objective existence?
Depends what you mean by "a thing". <snigger>
-- Robin