Bill wrote:
>I think that they as physical entities worked logically - That is also
I think I see a source of some misunderstandings. By 'logically" here, it
seems to me that you mean something akin to "working according to a
process." Is this a correct reading?
I would just note that because a thing is bounded by a process does not
imply that its behavior is inherantly rational or predictable. At least not
in a way that meshes well with the connotations of a word like "logic" or
"reason".
Consistantly predicting the weather 20-30 minutes in advance since the early
80's-
>specifically why I said "not word games" because something works
>logically, does not mean it makes sense.
-Prof. Tim