>>>and a four modern languages. The major goal of his talk was to
demonstrate
>>>that modern languages, when compared to their ancient ancestor languages
>>>from which they derive, have in fact deteriorated over the
>>>last few thousand years and not evolved into something more sophisticated
>>>and developed which is what evolutionists would like to have.
>This is an example. Evolutionists do not predict that languages become
>more sophisticated over time. So the fact that ancient languages have
>more complex grammar doesn't say anything about the theory of evolution,
>for or against.
I was never saying wether it was for or against, I just thought you might be
interested, if not I won't send you any more. If you have a response that
you would like posted just let me know and I will post it for you.
To my knowledge a "straw man" argument is a weak one, if I am wrong,
"enlighten" me please. I still don't see what my idea of straw man is has to
do with anything, I am just sending you stuff I thought you might enjoy
reading.
In Him,
-JDF-
jfern@ltsrv.ltnet.kelly.af.mil