>"Far from optimized for release" seems to be a fair description of Virus.=
=20
I agree, but it appears that Virus is going to have a beta release a
bit sooner than expected. I received this in the mail last night
from Lauren Guzak <guzak@thenet-usa.com>:
Hey Hey!
I=B9m the CD-ROM Editor at a magazine called The Net. The Church of=
Virus=20
has received the highest rating possible in our Reviews section, so I=B9=
m=20
writing to request permission to mirror part--or all--of this site on=20
the March edition of our monthly covermount disc.
Apparently The Net has a newsstand run of 250,000. If anyone objects to
having their messages appear in the list archive on the CD-ROM, please let
me know ASAP.
At 05:13 PM 05/12/95 -0500, Bradley O'Neill wrote:
> Homage is flattery...I'm just wondering what the odds are that these two
>ideas, Truth and Virus, would develop independently in nearly the same
>format.
Who was it that said truth is a virus? William S. Burroughs?
-- David McFadzean dbm@merak.com Memetic Engineer http://www.merak.com/~dbm/ Merak Projects Ltd.