> I would like you to submit
>a plan whereby mankind can live in balance with the earth when the scale
>(with respect to earth's resources) is completely tipped toward man. As
>far as I can see, it's not possible.
While I do think that the easiest solution to the problem of human
over-population would be to reduce the population, that is not realistic
goal -- at least not in the near future (the next 50 years or so). It
sounds like a good goal for the longer future, however.
The thing is that our ecological impact is a function of much more than
mere population. If the "scale is tipped" in the favor of humans over the
environment, then there is an implicit rivalry between the two. That is
part of the problem: the nature of our relationship with nature. That is
largely a memetic problem.
WHether that can realistically be changed in 50 years is a good question,
but we'll have a better chance of that than reducing the population through
smaller families and fewer children.
And yes, I DO think the next 50 years are critical.
____________________________________________________________________________
Tyson Vaughan memetic engineer
tvaughan@ux.accesscom.net graphic designer
"The way up and the way down are one and the same." - Heraclitus