>Virus would no doubt become corrupt if it ever became a mass movement just
>as all previous enlightened movements have, but it could still potentially
>evolve to world domination in this altered form. Would that be considered a
>success? Is there a goal in mind?
Would it not be best to simply "convert" those who are in a position to
institute social change. Ignore the masses and infect the movers...
>I never envisioned Virus to be an evangelical religion. Does the lack
>of proselytizing put us at a severe disadvantage with religions
>that do?
are we trying to convert all? A religion that would attract me includes
minimal proselytizing, but an excellent example set by the people who
subscribe to its ideals.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd M. Kuipers | Merak Projects Ltd.
New Media Propagandist | http://www.merak.com
tkuipers@merak.com | Developer of Oil & Gas Software
(403) 294 4336 | Calgary, Houston, Australia
http://www.merak.com/~tkuipers | Treekiller (403) 294 4301
-------------------------------------------------------------------
ytivarg luftif ni sgge gniyal egarag eht ni strovac god aishcuf eht
-------------------------------------------------------------------